Skip to the text

Article 63 — Assessment of the application for authorisation and grant or refusal of authorisation

Showing 57 of 57Release 10 Nov 2026Details

Coverage: Not covered: national guidance, court decisions.
Freshness: Release 2d86bd12 published 10 Nov 2026, 17:06 CET.
Shown: Showing 57 of 57
Failures: None.
Incomplete: No.

Implemented by · Level 20

None linked in our corpus. We hold 40 MiCA Level 2 acts; see all.

Explained by · Level 37

EBA/GL/2024/09Guideline — Qualifying Holder Suitability [final]EBA/GL/2024/09Guideline — Management Body Suitability [final]ESMA Q&A 2005Q&A — Crypto-asset services of a DLT MI [Answer Published]ESMA Q&A 2220Q&A — Entities not authorised as CASPs [Answer Published]ESMA Q&A 2295Q&A — Status of entities providing crypto-asset services [Answer Published]ESMA Q&A 2342Q&A — Natural persons/trusts as CASPs [Answer Published]ESMA Q&A 2364Q&A — Applicability of DORA and TFR Requirements to VASPs [Answer Published]

Cited by6

59(1)(a)Authorisation 59(2)Authorisation 59(4)Authorisation 59(6)Authorisation 59(8)Authorisation 143(3)Transitional measures

Defined terms23

3(1)terrorist financing 3(1)(5)crypto-asset 3(1)(15)crypto-asset service provider 3(1)(16)crypto-asset service 3(1)(27)management body 3(1)(28)credit institution 3(1)(29)investment firm 3(1)(31)close links 3(1)(35)Competent authorities 3(1)(36)qualifying holdings 3(1)(39)clients 3(1)(43)electronic money institution 3(1)(46)payment institution 3(1)(47)UCITS management company 3(1)(48)alternative investment fund manager 3(2)money laundering 3(25)subsidiary 3(27)parent undertaking 3(30)management body 3(42)central securities depository 3(47)insurance undertaking 3(52)institution for occupational retirement provision 3(55)crypto-asset service provider