Article 48 — Systems resilience, circuit breakers and electronic trading — compare
Showing 4 of 4Release 1 Nov 2026Details
- Coverage
- MiFID II: every English consolidation from 23 Mar 2023. Older wording is not held and is not replaced by any other text. Not covered: national guidance, court decisions.
- Freshness
- Release a4f2a049 published 1 Nov 2026, 17:41 CET. This article checked word for word against EUR-Lex on 26 Oct 2026.
- Shown
- Showing 4 of 4
- Failures
- None.
- Incomplete
- No.
- From
- 28 March 2024 · Consolidated version of 28 March 2024 · Checked against EUR-Lex on 1 Nov 2026 · Official source
- To
- 2 November 2026 · Consolidated version of 17 January 2025 · Checked against EUR-Lex on 1 Nov 2026 · Official source
1.Member States shall require a regulated market to have establish and maintain its operational resilience in place effective systems, procedures and arrangements accordance with the requirements laid down in Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 to ensure its trading systems are resilient, have sufficient capacity to deal with peak order and message volumes, are able to ensure orderly trading under conditions of severe market stress, are fully tested to ensure such conditions are met and are subject to effective business continuity arrangements, including ICT business continuity policy and plans and ICT response and recovery plans established in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, to ensure continuity of its services if there is any failure of its trading systems.
6.Member States shall require a regulated market to have in place effective systems, procedures and arrangements, including requiring members or participants to carry out appropriate testing of algorithms and providing environments to facilitate such testing in accordance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II and IV of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, to ensure that algorithmic trading systems cannot create or contribute to disorderly trading conditions on the market and to manage any disorderly trading conditions which do arise from such algorithmic trading systems, including systems to limit the ratio of unexecuted orders to transactions that may be entered into the system by a member or participant, to be able to slow down the flow of orders if there is a risk of its system capacity being reached and to limit and enforce the minimum tick size that may be executed on the market.