--- title: "EBA Q&A 2021_5755 — Q&A — On the access to safeguarding accounts through [Final Q&A]" shortTitle: "EBA Q&A 2021_5755 — Q&A — On the access to safeguarding accounts through [Final Q&A]" answer_id: EBA_QA_2021_5755 status: "Final Q&A" type: qa instrument_type: qa authority: EBA binding: false binding_character: non_binding legal_status: in_force regulation: "PSD2" psd2_level3: true mica_level2: false legal_basis: "Article 4(12) PSD2" date: 6 January 2023 source_link: https://www.eba.europa.eu/single-rule-book-qa/qna/view/publicId/2021_5755 lifecycle: "Final Q&A" text_version: "EBA Q&A register, 6 January 2023" source_url: "https://www.eba.europa.eu/single-rule-book-qa/qna/view/publicId/2021_5755" check_status: matched verified: true last_checked: 2026-10-26 checked_against: "the EBA publication" source: prepared_by: "European Commission" published_by: "EBA" published_in: "EBA Single Rulebook Q&A tool" evidence: prepared_by: "Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law." locator: "EBA Q&A register entry 2021_5755, field 'Answer prepared by'" document_type: "qa_answer" legal_nature: "not_legislation" addressees: "not stated in the document" dates: published_on: "2023-01-06" question_submitted_on: "2021-02-23" locators: published_on: "EBA Q&A register entry 2021_5755, field 'Final publishing date'" question_submitted_on: "EBA Q&A register entry 2021_5755, field 'Submission date'" lifecycle_label: "Final Q&A" --- **Answer prepared by the European Commission, published in the EBA Q&A tool · not legislation · published 6 Jan 2023 [Final Q&A]** *Final Q&A · EBA Q&A register, 6 January 2023 · Checked against the EBA publication on 26 Oct 2026 · [Official source](https://www.eba.europa.eu/single-rule-book-qa/qna/view/publicId/2021_5755)* | | | |---|---| | **Full title** | EBA Q&A 2021_5755 — Q&A — On the access to safeguarding accounts through \[Final Q&A\] | | **Prepared by** | European Commission | | **Published by** | EBA, in the EBA Single Rulebook Q&A tool | | **Reference** | EBA_QA_2021_5755 | | **Document type** | Q&A | | **Legal nature** | Not legislation | | **Addressees** | Not stated in the document | | **Dates** | Published 6 January 2023; question submitted 23 February 2021 | | **Legal basis** | Article 4(12) PSD2 | | **Related instruments** | None recorded | | **Text on this page** | Word for word — the full text of the EBA publication | **On the access to safeguarding accounts through the Application Programming Interface (API)** ### Question Shall a safeguarding account of the e-money institution (EMI) or/and of the payment institution (EMI and PI) within the account servicing payment service provider (ASPSP) be considered as a payment account and therefore should be accessible (displayed) through the Application Programming Interface (API) of ASPSP? ### Background Safeguarding account is a separate account opened in a credit institution to ensure the segregation of the payment service user’s funds from the EMI’s and PI’s funds in accordance with Article 10 of PSD2. Some ASPSPs take the view that the safeguarding account and its information (balance, statement, transactions, etc.) should not be accessible by third party providers (TPPs) connecting via the PSD2 APIs, because these accounts are not classified as payment accounts according to the PSD2, although these accounts have certain characteristics of a payment account. It seems that the classification of safeguarding accounts is determined individually by the ASPSPs and therefore there is no harmonised treatment across the EU, so this interferes with the activities of the TPP. *** ### Answer Payment institutions that provide payment services as referred to in points (1) to (6) of Annex I to Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2) are required to safeguard the funds received for the execution of payment transactions. This can, amongst others, be done by depositing the funds in a separate account at a credit institution (Article 10(1)(a) PSD2). The access to payment accounts is subject to several conditions laid down under Articles 65-67 PSD2. These conditions are, amongst others, that the accessed account be qualified as a “payment account” in accordance with Article 4(12) PSD2, and that the account be accessible online. For an account to be considered as a “payment account” within the meaning of PSD2, the account in question must be used for the execution of payment transactions. Therefore, if the safeguarding account is used for the execution of payment transactions, it is then a payment account which, if accessible online, must be accessible to Third Party Providers (TPPs) through the relevant interface. In view of the use case envisaged by the submitter, we understand that the payment institution/e-money institution (PI/EMI) which has opened a safeguarding account with a credit institution wants to access it through a TPP. This may be possible under the conditions set out above. The payment services users (PSUs) of the PI/EMI however should not be able to access safeguarding accounts through TPPs, since these accounts are opened in the name of the PI/EMI, and not in the name of the PSUs of the PI/EMI. If the payment account is accessible online, the respective PSU (an EMI or a PI) has the right to make use of TPPs’ payment services, in accordance with Articles 66(1) and 67(1) PSD2. *** **Source:** [EBA original document](https://www.eba.europa.eu/single-rule-book-qa/qna/view/publicId/2021_5755) ## Related Level 1 articles - [Article 4 — Definitions](../../../articles/4.md)