<!-- headlesslaw {"release":{"id":"a4f2a0495fe55b47323883f82977a9b34ab66171ec9623e39925d3a7045b6c81","published":"2026-11-01T16:41:30Z","pinned":false},"limits":{"coverage":{"history":"current_only","held_since":"2017-04-04","gaps":[],"covered":["ESMA Q&A 1053 — Q&A — Best Execution [Answer Published] L3"],"not_covered":["national guidance","court decisions"]},"freshness":{"release_id":"a4f2a0495fe55b47323883f82977a9b34ab66171ec9623e39925d3a7045b6c81","release_published":"2026-11-01T16:41:30Z","checked_at":"2026-10-26","checked_against":"the ESMA publication"},"truncation":null,"failures":[],"incomplete":[]},"page":{"path":"/mifid-ii/level-3/q-and-a/esma/esma-qa-1053-best-execution","url":"https://www.headlesslaw.com/mifid-ii/level-3/q-and-a/esma/esma-qa-1053-best-execution","title":"ESMA Q&A 1053 — Q&A — Best Execution [Answer Published]","family":"l3","work_id":"spaces/mifid-ii/level-3/q-and-a/esma/esma-qa-1053-best-execution","status":"answer published","force_status":null,"date_state":"current","requested_date":null,"as_of":"2026-11-01","applies_from":null,"application":null,"version_label":"ESMA Q&A register, 4 April 2017","check":{"against":"the ESMA publication","on":"2026-10-26"},"check_result":"matched","official_url":"https://www.esma.europa.eu/publications-data/questions-answers/1053","valid_from":"0001-01-01","valid_until":null,"revision":1,"content_id":"37ef40dc8e450967","change_date":null,"nearest_versions":["2017-04-04"],"first_text_date":null,"correction_applies":false,"versions":["2017-04-04"],"version_url":"https://www.headlesslaw.com/mifid-ii/level-3/q-and-a/esma/esma-qa-1053-best-execution/versions/2017-04-04","revision_url":"https://www.headlesslaw.com/mifid-ii/level-3/q-and-a/esma/esma-qa-1053-best-execution/versions/2017-04-04/rev/37ef40dc8e450967","versions_url":"https://www.headlesslaw.com/mifid-ii/level-3/q-and-a/esma/esma-qa-1053-best-execution/versions","relations_url":"https://www.headlesslaw.com/mifid-ii/level-3/q-and-a/esma/esma-qa-1053-best-execution/relations","source_line":"Answer by ESMA, published in its Q&A tool · not legislation · published 4 Apr 2017 [Answer Published]","attribution":{"prepared_by":"ESMA","published_by":"ESMA","published_in":"ESMA Q&A tool","document_type":"qa_answer","legal_nature":"not_legislation","addressees":"not stated in the document","dates":{"published_on":"2017-04-04","question_submitted_on":"2017-04-04","locators":{"published_on":"ESMA Q&A Excel export ESMA_QA_1053, column 'Esma responses', date line","question_submitted_on":"ESMA Q&A Excel export ESMA_QA_1053, column 'Date of submission'"}},"adoption":null}}} -->
---
title: "ESMA Q&A 1053 — Q&A — Best Execution [Answer Published]"
shortTitle: "ESMA Q&A 1053 — Q&A — Best Execution [Answer Published]"
answer_id: ESMA_QA_1053
topic: "Best Execution"
status: "Answer Published"
type: qa
instrument_type: qa
authority: ESMA
binding: false
binding_character: non_binding
legal_status: in_force
regulation: "MiFID II"
mifid_level3: true
mica_level2: false
legal_basis: "MiFID II"
date: 4 April 2017
source_link: https://www.esma.europa.eu/publications-data/questions-answers/1053
lifecycle: "Answer Published"
text_version: "ESMA Q&A register, 4 April 2017"
source_url: "https://www.esma.europa.eu/publications-data/questions-answers/1053"
check_status: matched
verified: true
last_checked: 2026-10-26
checked_against: "the ESMA publication"
source:
  prepared_by: "ESMA"
  published_by: "ESMA"
  published_in: "ESMA Q&A tool"
  evidence:
    prepared_by: "ESMA Answer"
    locator: "ESMA Q&A entry ESMA_QA_1053: field 'ESMA Answer', no 'Answer provided by' line"
document_type: "qa_answer"
legal_nature: "not_legislation"
addressees: "not stated in the document"
dates:
  published_on: "2017-04-04"
  question_submitted_on: "2017-04-04"
  locators:
    published_on: "ESMA Q&A Excel export ESMA_QA_1053, column 'Esma responses', date line"
    question_submitted_on: "ESMA Q&A Excel export ESMA_QA_1053, column 'Date of submission'"
lifecycle_label: "Answer Published"
---

**Answer by ESMA, published in its Q&A tool · not legislation · published 4 Apr 2017 [Answer Published]**

*Answer Published · ESMA Q&A register, 4 April 2017 · Checked against the ESMA publication on 26 Oct 2026 · [Official source](https://www.esma.europa.eu/publications-data/questions-answers/1053)*

| | |
|---|---|
| **Full title** | ESMA Q&A 1053 — Q&A — Best Execution \[Answer Published\] |
| **Prepared by** | ESMA |
| **Published by** | ESMA, in the ESMA Q&A tool |
| **Reference** | ESMA_QA_1053 |
| **Document type** | Q&A |
| **Legal nature** | Not legislation |
| **Addressees** | Not stated in the document |
| **Dates** | Published 4 April 2017; question submitted 4 April 2017 |
| **Legal basis** | MiFID II |
| **Related instruments** | None recorded |
| **Text on this page** | Word for word — the full text of the ESMA publication |

**Best Execution**

### Question

When an investment firm operates an OTF, at which level should the best execution policy be set? At the level of the investment firm or at the level of the OTF or both? Would similar requirements apply to a market operator operating an OTF?

***

### Answer

\[ESMA35-43-349 MiFID II Investor Protection Best execution Q&A13\]

Where an investment firm operates an OTF, ESMA is of the view that the investment firm’s best execution policy should cover how orders are executed both at the level of the investment firm and at the level of the OTF and, in particular, how discretion is exercised at each stage.

Firstly, an investment firm operating an OTF should, in the same way as other investment firms that execute client orders, have a firm-level execution policy setting out the various execution venues, including its own OTF, that it will be considering when receiving a client order and explain in which circumstances an execution venue would prevail over the others.

Secondly, the investment firm should have either a separate policy or an additional section in the firm-level execution policy governing how, when a client order is then sent to the OTF, the best possible result for the client is achieved taking into account the trading interests in the system and the different execution mechanisms that may be available on the OTF, such as voice execution, electronic RFQ or order book.

As the exercise of discretion by the investment firm in its OTF operator capacity is to be in compliance with its execution policy, the document should also set out in detail, the area(s) in which the OTF operator intends to exercise discretion and the basis on which such discretion will be exercised (Article 20(6) of MiFID II).

Equivalent requirements apply to a market operator operating an OTF. In this regard, a market operator would need to have a best execution policy in place, setting out the conditions under which an order received by a client may be executed on its OTF, as described above.

***

**Source:** [ESMA original document](https://www.esma.europa.eu/publications-data/questions-answers/1053)
